Uncategorized

Keir Starmer weakened as he is mercilessly mocked for being a phantom Prime Minister

FILES-BRITAIN-POLITICS-LABOUR-STARMER-STREETING

Wes Streeting denies being part of a plot to oust Sir Keir Starmer (Image: Pool/AFP via Getty)

Sir Keir Starmer has been mocked for being in office “but not in power” as his floundering leadership plunges into further chaos. An extraordinary civil war continues to rage inside No 10 and at the top of the Labour Party following an alleged plot to remove him from office.

It has left the Prime Minister facing demands to sack his closest aide for a bungled bid to kill off the supposed leadership threat by Wes Streeting. The Health Secretary denied claims that he was planning a coup and attacked a “toxic” culture in Downing Street.

Prime Minister's Questions

Kemi Badenoch mercilessly mocked Sir Keir Starmer at PMQs (Image: PA)

Sir Keir gave a lukewarm backing to Morgan McSweeney, his long-time ally and chief of staff.

The humiliating saga, which comes less than a fortnight before a crunch Budget, has left Sir Keir severely weakened after a disastrous 15 months as Prime Minister.

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said: “The Prime Minister has shown he is in office, but not in power.”

She added: “Two weeks before the Budget, this Prime Minister has lost control of his Government.

“He’s lost the confidence of the Labour Party. And he’s lost the trust of the British people.”

The pound dropped to its lowest level in more than two years on Wednesday as speculation over the Prime Minister’s future erupted.

It is the second alleged plot to oust the PM in as many months, after it was claimed Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham was planning a move against him.

Sir Keir was forced to condemn “completely unacceptable” attacks on Mr Streeting during Prime Minister’s Questions.

He claimed his Cabinet is “united” and that the Health Secretary “is doing a great job”.

The Prime Minister told MPs that he had “never authorised attacks” on Cabinet ministers.

Senior No 10 sources said Sir Keir would fight any leadership challenge but suggested the briefing against Mr Streeting had not come from Downing Street.

Mr Streeting called for anyone behind the “juvenile” briefing against him to be sacked as he complained about the culture within Sir Keir’s administration.

His criticism of the No 10 operation focused fresh attention on Mr McSweeney, the mastermind of Labour’s 2024 election success.

Facing off against the PM in the Commons, Mrs Badenoch said “the Government has descended into a civil war” and asked Sir Keir to say whether he still had full confidence in Mr McSweeney.

“Morgan McSweeney, my team and I are absolutely focused on delivering for the country,” Sir Keir told her.

“I’ve never authorised attacks on Cabinet members. I appointed them to their posts because they are the best people to carry out their jobs.”

Mr Streeting gave a series of broadcast interviews on Wednesday morning before speaking at a health conference.

Morgan McSweeney

Sir Keir Starmer defended Morgan McSweeney at PMQs (Image: Ian Vogler/Reach Plc)

He criticised whoever was responsible for the rumours, suggesting they had been “watching too much Celebrity Traitors”.

Mr Streeting told BBC Radio 4’s Today: “There are people around the Prime Minister who do not follow his model and style of leadership.

“I can tell you, without having even spoken to the Prime Minister, what he thinks of briefing, what his reaction will be to the front pages and the broadcast bulletins overnight and the words I’m sure he would use are not suitable for a family show like this.”

Asked if he should sack those responsible, Mr Streeting said: “Yes. But he’s got to find them first and I wouldn’t expect him to waste loads of time on this.”

Quizzed at an NHS conference in Manchester if he would fight alongside Sir Keir if there were any plots to oust him as PM, Streeting said: “Yes.”

“The bizarre thing about some juvenile briefing overnight is it’s people in No 10 who’ve said the PM is fighting for his job,” he said.

“I don’t think that’s a helpful or constructive thing to say, I also don’t think it’s true,” he added.

Asked whether he thought Mr McSweeney was responsible for the culture in Downing Street, Mr Streeting said: “I am not going to add to the toxic culture by contributing to the toxic culture and going after individuals.

“I don’t think that is a constructive or positive thing to do.

“One thing I would say for Morgan McSweeney is there wouldn’t be a Labour government without him.”

The unrest at the top of the party comes after Labour’s poll ratings have plummeted since Sir Keir delivered a landslide General Election victory in July 2024.

Rachel Reeves’s Budget in a fortnight could see the party rip up its manifesto promise not to increase income tax, and MPs fear a bloodbath in elections next May in English councils and the Scottish and Welsh parliaments.

One fed-up Labour MP told the Daily Express: “I was hoping things can only get better. How wrong I was.”

There is a high bar to launch a leadership challenge against the Prime Minister.

A challenger for the Labour leadership can only initiate an election with the public support of 20% of the party’s MPs, which currently means 80 nominations would be needed.

Labour affiliates, including the trade unions, would be able to vote in any subsequent ballot alongside individual members.

LEAVE A RESPONSE

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Uncategorized

Gefangen an der Küste – Soldaten der 716. Infanterie-Division in alliierter HandIm Juni 1944, während der alliierten Invasion in der Normandie, gerieten zahlreiche deutsche Soldaten in Gefangenschaft – unter ihnen auch viele Angehörige der 716. Infanterie-Division der Wehrmacht. Diese Division war direkt an der französischen Küste stationiert, mit der Aufgabe, den sogenannten Atlantikwall zu verteidigen – ein gigantisches System aus Bunkern, Panzersperren und Geschützstellungen, das einen alliierten Angriff abwehren sollte. Doch der D-Day am 6. Juni 1944 – Codename Operation Overlord – brachte diese Verteidigungslinie zum Einsturz. Die alliierten Streitkräfte, bestehend aus amerikanischen, britischen, kanadischen und anderen Truppen, landeten an mehreren Abschnitten der normannischen Küste. Die 716. Division, bestehend aus unerfahrenen, oft schlecht ausgerüsteten Soldaten, wurde förmlich überrollt. Ihre Einheiten waren verstreut, unterbesetzt und meist nicht für einen groß angelegten Landungsangriff vorbereitet. Die meisten dieser Soldaten hatten nur begrenzte Kampferfahrung. Viele stammten aus Reserveeinheiten, einige waren ältere Jahrgänge oder Rekruten aus besetzten Gebieten. Der Widerstand war zwar vereinzelt hartnäckig, doch gegenüber der überlegenen Feuerkraft und Luftunterstützung der Alliierten blieb der Erfolg begrenzt. Schon in den ersten Stunden nach der Landung wurden ganze Gruppen von deutschen Soldaten eingekesselt und zur Aufgabe gezwungen. Fotos aus dieser Zeit zeigen erschöpfte, resignierte deutsche Soldaten, oft mit erhobenen Händen oder von alliierten Soldaten bewacht – ein stilles Bild der Niederlage. Für viele von ihnen begann nun ein ungewisses Schicksal in Kriegsgefangenschaft. Die Alliierten behandelten ihre Gefangenen zumeist gemäß der Genfer Konvention, doch die Bedingungen in den Lagern variierten, abhängig vom Ort, der Kapazität und dem Zeitpunkt der Gefangennahme. Die Gefangennahme der 716. Division war nicht nur ein taktischer Rückschlag für die Wehrmacht, sondern auch ein Symbol für die beginnende Wende im Krieg. Der Mythos der Unbesiegbarkeit deutscher Verteidigungslinien war gebrochen, und mit jeder weiteren Stunde rückten die Alliierten tiefer nach Frankreich vor. Die Soldaten der 716. Division, gefangen genommen an jenem Schicksalstag im Juni, standen stellvertretend für viele junge Männer, die in einem Krieg kämpften, dessen Ziele und Grausamkeit ihnen oft fernlagen. Ihr Weg endete nicht selten in Gefangenschaft – und für manche bedeutete er den Anfang eines langen inneren Prozesses der Konfrontation mit der eigenen Rolle in einem untergehenden Regime. Hỏi ChatGPT