The Combat Veteran vs. The Inquisitor: Inside the DNI Hearing That Systematicallly Dismantled Adam Schiff

WASHINGTON, D.C. — In the high-stakes world of national intelligence, a single document can change the course of history. But during a recent Senate Intelligence Committee hearing, it wasn’t a secret satellite photo or a decrypted cable that shook the foundations of the Capitol—it was a thick, classified binder held by the newly confirmed Director of National Intelligence (DNI), Tulsi Gabbard.

In what is already being hailed as the most devastating political exchange in modern history, Gabbard, a combat veteran with two decades of service, faced off against Senator Adam Schiff. What began as Schiff’s attempt to brand Gabbard a “Russian asset” ended with the systematic, document-backed exposure of Schiff’s own six-year history of intelligence manipulation.

.

.

.

The Accusation: Perjury Under Oath?

The hearing room was packed to capacity as Senator Schiff opened his questioning with a practiced air of gravity. “Director Gabbard,” Schiff began, his voice resonant with insinuation, “your positions align suspiciously well with Russian interests… perhaps you’ve been compromised by Russian influence operations.”

The room went silent. Schiff had just accused the sitting DNI of treason under oath.

Gabbard didn’t flinch. Instead, she leaned into the microphone with the calm of a soldier who had faced enemy fire in Iraq. “Senator Schiff, that is a very serious accusation,” she said. “As DNI, I have access to every piece of intelligence regarding foreign influence—including intelligence regarding myself. Do you have any evidence for that claim? Because if you don’t, you just committed perjury in your opening statement.”

The Receipts: 47 Instances of Deception

Gabbard opened her binder, not to show new secrets, but to declassify the old ones. She systematically walked through Schiff’s public record, beginning with the Trump-Russia collusion narrative.

“From 2017 to 2019, you went on television 47 documented times claiming you had seen ‘more than circumstantial evidence’ of collusion,” Gabbard noted, as clips of Schiff on CNN, MSNBC, and ABC played on the gallery screens.

“Then the Mueller Report was released,” she continued, quoting from page two of volume one: ‘The investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government.’ Gabbard’s question was a hammer blow: “Either Mueller missed the evidence you claimed to have, or you were lying to the American people to raise money. Which is it, Senator?”

The FISA Abuse and the “51 Experts” Letter

The dismantling didn’t stop at collusion. Gabbard pivoted to the 2018 FISA abuse scandal. She held up the Nunes Memo—which Schiff had once called “deliberately misleading”—alongside the Horowitz IG Report, which later proved the FBI had indeed lied to the FISA court 17 times.

“You defended the FBI lying to a secret court,” Gabbard stated. “You defended the use of Russian disinformation—the Steele Dossier—to spy on American citizens. The IG report proved every part of your counter-memo was false.”

Then came the “smoking gun” regarding the 2020 election: The letter signed by 51 former intelligence officials claiming the Hunter Biden laptop was “Russian disinformation.”

“The FBI authenticated that laptop in November 2019,” Gabbard revealed, citing declassified FBI documentation. “You signed a letter calling it a Russian operation in October 2020, knowing the media would use it to suppress the story. You interfered in an election with a lie dressed up as an intelligence assessment.”

The Fraud and the Fallout

The final hour of the hearing focused on the financial and procedural “weaponization” of Schiff’s position. Gabbard produced FEC filings showing that Schiff had raised $38 million between 2017 and 2019, largely from small donors who believed his claims of having “secret evidence” of collusion.

“That’s not politics, Senator; that’s fraudulent solicitation,” Gabbard said. “You used your security clearance as a piggy bank.”

Furthermore, she addressed the destruction of evidence by the January 6th Committee, of which Schiff was a key member. “You destroyed thousands of hours of testimony and documents rather than preserve them for the minority to review. authoritarians destroy evidence. Truth-seekers preserve it.”

The Aftermath: A Career in Ruins

The reaction was swift and global. The hashtag #SchiffLied trended for six days. Across TikTok, YouTube, and X (formerly Twitter), clips of the exchange garnered over 127 million views within 72 hours.

The political fallout has been catastrophic for the California Senator:

• Exile: Schiff announced he would not seek re-election to any Senate leadership positions.

• Ethics Complaints: Republican senators filed a formal ethics complaint alleging perjury and abuse of office.

• Polling: Schiff’s approval rating in California plummeted from 52% to a staggering 18%.

• The “Obama Kiss of Death”: A leaked report suggested former President Barack Obama warned that Schiff’s credibility problems were becoming the party’s “credibility problem.”

The Final Verdict: Who Is the Real Threat?

As the hearing concluded, Gabbard stood for a final statement that has since become a viral rallying cry.

“The American people can now decide,” Gabbard said, looking directly into the camera. “Who is the real threat to our democracy? The combat veteran who has held a security clearance for 20 years without a single violation? Or the politician who has lied about intelligence for six years, leaked classified info to damage opponents, and profited from fraud?”

Schiff’s silence was absolute. For the first time in his career, the man who lived by the leak and the “secret source” found himself undone by the declassified truth.